PDA

View Full Version : At Rezko Trial, Karl Rove Mentioned



jcapeverde
04-30-2008, 01:40 AM
In the Rezko Trial, A New Name Surfaces: Karl Rove

Michael Isikoff
NEWSWEEK

http://www.newsweek.com/id/134294 (http://www.newsweek.com/id/134294)

Updated: 12:58 PM ET Apr 26, 2008

http://ndn.newsweek.com/media/37/Rezco-Rove-hsmall-vertical.jpgTangled Web: The name of Rove, right, will be raised in Rezko's trial

The trial of Chicago developer and political fixer Antoin "Tony" Rezko has been closely watched for any mention of the defendant's onetime friend, Barack Obama. But last week, prosecutors threw a curveball, telling the judge that one of their witnesses is prepared to raise the name of another prominent Washington hand: Karl Rove. Former Illinois state official Ali Ata is expected to testify about a conversation he had with Rezko in which the developer alleged Rove was "working with" a top Illinois Republican to remove the Chicago U.S. attorney, Patrick Fitzgerald.

The allegation, which Rove denies, quickly reverberated in Washington. Democrats in Congress now want to question Ata. They believe he can help buttress their theory that Rove played a key role in discussions that led to the firings of U.S. attorneys at the Justice Department in 2006. The House Judiciary Committee "intends to investigate the facts and circumstances alleged in this testimony," panel chairman Rep. John Conyers of Michigan said in a statement to NEWSWEEK.

Investigators are intrigued by the timing of the alleged conversation about Fitzgerald. According to the Rezko prosecutors, it took place in November 2004—weeks after Fitzgerald had subpoenaed Rove to testify for the third time in another matter he was aggressively investigating, the Valerie Plame CIA leak case. A source familiar with Ata's testimony (who asked not to be identified talking about sensitive matters) said that Ata was meeting regularly with Rezko that fall. The two men shared a concern about Fitzgerald's ongoing probe of Illinois public officials. In one of those conversations, the developer allegedly told Ata that Bob Kjellander, a prominent GOP state lobbyist, was talking to Rove about getting rid of Fitzgerald. The reason: to "get a new U.S. attorney" who would not pursue the Illinois corruption probe, the source said. Ata, who has pleaded guilty to corruption-related charges and is now cooperating with the Feds, has no evidence that the conversation took place other than what Rezko allegedly told him, the source says.

Kjellander denies that he told Rezko anything of the kind. "I never had a discussion with Karl Rove or any other person on the White House staff" about firing Fitzgerald, said Kjellander, now a top GOP official in charge of this summer's convention. Rove's lawyer, Bob Luskin, told NEWSWEEK that Rove "does not recall" a conversation with Kjellander about Fitzgerald. He added that Rove "never talked to anybody in the White House about removing Fitzgerald."

Conyers's investigators apparently are not convinced. They've filed a civil-contempt lawsuit to force the White House to turn over documents about the U.S. attorney firings. In recent court papers, lawyers for the full House of Representatives charge that the White House has "stonewalled" efforts to sort out the U.S. attorney firings; they cite an e-mail disclosed last year showing that Rove visited the White House counsel's office in 2005 and asked "how we planned to proceed regarding US attorneys … he said the matter was urgent." (In the e-mail, Rove wanted to know if all the attorneys would be asked to resign "or only some of them.") Conyers, whose staff has been probing other allegations of White House meddling in criminal prosecutions, recently renewed a demand for Rove to testify. If he refuses to appear, Conyers said, "the committee is prepared to resort to compulsory process"—i.e., a subpoena.

kaaos
04-30-2008, 02:19 AM
the GOP is holding a trump card.

they have some shit on Obama that wont surface until he gets the Dem nod.

The rezko/obama land deal is just the surface.

I really really hope i am way the fuck wrong on this.

House Music Aficionado
04-30-2008, 11:41 AM
the GOP is holding a trump card.

they have some shit on Obama that wont surface until he gets the Dem nod.

The rezko/obama land deal is just the surface.

I really really hope i am way the fuck wrong on this.


….

I agree on this one. That innuendo does carry some merit.


Also, I’ll extend this theory further by suggesting that the GOP not only has the ultimate arsenal lined up for a PR assault against Obama but also against Clinton. From the GOP standpoint, no sense in launch attacks against either of the candidates at least not until a DNC nominee has been decided.


Furthermore, the GOP could care less as to who the DNC nominee is ---- to them either or is BEATABLE. As much as I’d loathe seeing a GOP in the Oral Office for another 4 years, I’ve said this before and I’ll be steadfast instating it again: Neither Obama nor Clinton will be able to defeat the war mongering grumpy old fart McCain, come November , unless there’s a miracle or some landslide-like shift in the popular consensus.

….