PDA

View Full Version : Maybe Michael Moore wasn't booed...



ChiJAM
03-27-2003, 08:52 AM
CHERYL SEAL REPORTS MARCH 24: Anti-propaganda Media Analysis
by Cheryl Seal
(No verified email address)
As the Bush War escalates, so does the intensity of propaganda cranked out by the corporate media. Voices that counter the onslaught of disinformation are desperately needed. Thus this hastily-constructed "Media MASH UNIT" is dedicated to providing life support to the first casualty of war: TRUTH.
THE "MYSTERIOUS MICROPHONE" PLOY

Although we have all now witnessed the wonders of visual "movie magic" in the editing of news footage (remember the missing protestors in the footage of the presidential inauguration?), a new, more insidious bit of "magic" is gaining favor with propagandists. I like to call this technique the "mysterious microphone" ploy, because it is a mystery how what the ear hears live and the network microphones transmit up can be so different! During the speeches given during the massive protest in Washington, D.C. before the war was declared, to hear C-SPAN 's audio coverage, there was often barely a ripple of response by the audience to the speakers. Of course, those present know that the applause and cheering from the crowd that punctuated the speeches was thunderous. But the audience at home, unaware of the live reality, would swear that the activists were playing to a subdued and/or small crowd.

When Michael Moore delivered his blast of the Bush Reich at the Oscars, he was, in reality, given a standing ovation and hearty applause. But, to hear the soundbyte presented on the network news, you'd never know it. All you can hear are boos...which, in fact, came from about five people, from eyewitness accounts.

Conversely, when Bush so much as smirks at a public affair, to hear the "mysterious microphones" tell it, every person in the place thunderously cheers and applauds. So when you combine the mysterious microphone effect with skillful editing you can, quite effectively, lie through your teeth.

Example: The network coverage of Moore (all 3 seconds of it) shows Moore briefly, then, while cutting to a handful of stony-faced people, cranks up the volumne on the five booers. The result: a totally false statement: Moore's speech was met by boos and grim silence, not by enthusiasm and a standing ovation


Michael Moore's statement at Oscars

"We live in the time where we have fictitious election results that elect a fictitious president," Moore said. "We live in a time where we have a man who's sending us to war for fictitious reasons, whether it's the fiction of duct tape or the fiction of orange alerts."Applause gave way to some boos, as the orchestra began playing to cue the filmmaker to leave the stage."We are against this war, Mr. Bush. Shame on you, Mr. Bush. Shame on you," Moore shouted.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2003/03/23/state2309EST0088.DTL

While Moore received a STANDING OVATION, only a few booed probably Charlton Heston, Bruce "Please send me to Iraq, Mr. Bush" Willis, and Arnold "testosterone-challenged" Swharzenneger.

'When asked by reporters why he made the remarks, he answered: "I'm an American."
"Is that all?"
"Oh, that's a lot," Moore responded. He dismissed the jeers he received, telling reporters: "Don't report that there was a split decision in the hall because five loud people booed."

Cheddar
03-27-2003, 09:21 AM
Where did you find this??

If I could see where this came from and find it valid I would Love to throw it in someone's FACE.

ChiJAM
03-27-2003, 09:30 AM
Here you go: http://baltimore.indymedia.org/newswire/display/3290/index.php

ramar
03-27-2003, 09:32 AM
nice post ChiJAM thanks for mentioning this

Cheddar
03-27-2003, 09:41 AM
Originally posted by ChiJAM:
Here you go: http://baltimore.indymedia.org/newswire/display/3290/index.php You are too kind!

djmarbll
03-27-2003, 09:51 AM
Great link 1343. I've read more of the article and it goes on to separate the truth from the fiction about this war. I wonder how (or if) the media will report that some of Iraq's weapons caches are from Wallop Defence Systems, a British company.

Cheddar
03-27-2003, 09:53 AM
Originally posted by djmarbll:
Great link 1343. I've read more of the article and it goes on to separate the truth from the fiction about this war. I wonder how (or if) the media will report that some of Iraq's weapons caches are from Wallop Defence Systems, a British company. It was ChiJam.

D J 1 3 8
03-27-2003, 10:09 AM
If you were watching the Oscars, you would have seen for yourself. It was an even mix of cheers and boos from what I saw.

I was watching it at a bar/restaurant that had an Oscar party, and the entire restaurant started cheering.