PDA

View Full Version : TRIBUTE TO THE SPEAKER



Martin Red
03-26-2003, 05:38 AM
Sound Basics
To understand how speakers work, you first need to understand how sound works.
Inside your ear is a very thin piece of skin called the eardrum. When your eardrum vibrates, your brain interprets the vibrations as sound -- that's how you hear. Rapid changes in air pressure are the most common thing to vibrate your eardrum.

An object produces sound when it vibrates in air (sound can also travel through liquids and solids, but air is the transmission medium when we listen to speakers). When something vibrates, it moves the air particles around it. Those air particles in turn move the air particles around them, carrying the pulse of the vibration through the air as a traveling disturbance.

To see how this works, let's look at a simple vibrating object -- a bell. When you ring a bell, the metal vibrates -- flexes in and out -- rapidly. When it flexes out on one side, it pushes out on the surrounding air particles on that side. These air particles then collide with the particles in front of them, which collide with the particles in front of them and so on. When the bell flexes away, it pulls in on these surrounding air particles, creating a drop in pressure that pulls in on more surrounding air particles, which creates another drop in pressure that pulls in particles that are even farther out and so on. This decreasing of pressure is called rarefaction.
SOURCE: http://howstuffworks.lycoszone.com/speaker1.htm

http://www.hi-fiworld.co.uk/hfw/hfwImages/oldeworlde/yamahans1000m.gif
"Why, if humankind has put vehicles on Mars and mastered open-heart surgery, can it not design an accurate loudspeaker? Even at the best of times, modern 'speakers are compromised devices, and getting one to work properly from 20Hz to 20kHz is still an uncommon occurrence.

Given that moving-coil drivers have all sorts of colorations to sully them, and that electrostatics only work effectively over a limited frequency range, engineers have to employ clever tricks to get the best from these units. Back in the early Seventies, Yamaha decided the answer was Beryllium domes, and the NS1000 was born.

Using this expensive metal, Yamaha came up with treble and midrange drivers that produced extremely low levels of distortion, excellent dispersion and phase coherence. In fact, mated together by a complex crossover network, they behaved much as an electrostatic panel but with more extended highs and better power handling. Matched with a fast, light, rigid paper-coned 300mm bass unit, the combination was dynamite.

The first NS1000s went on sale in 1975, built like the proverbial brick powder room and with HF and midrange trim pots built into the front baffles. At over £400, their price reflected their advanced engineering and superb 32kg-per-box build. They were quite unlike anything people had ever heard * best described as sounding like a Quad ESL with a ribbon super-tweeter and a sub-woofer to handle the lows!

In Japan and the States they were rapturously received, with recording studios and broadcast companies throwing their money at Yamaha. Quite simply, there was no other 'speaker to touch the NS1000's combination of transparency, speed and power handling. But over here, reactions were mixed. Reviewers used to soft, bland Bextrene-coned BBC monitors found them forward and fatiguing and prone to harshness and fizz.

The problem was that the Yamahas were utterly unforgiving of the amps that drove them. With high sensitivity and a relatively easy load, most Japanese audiophiles were using them with muscular valve amps that had a warm, smooth sound. In Britain the fashion was for big, punchy transistor power amps such as Naim's NAP250, which, without soft Bextrene or polypropylene cones to hide behind, could sound * yes, that's right * forward, fatiguing and fizzy!

In 1977 the NS1000s gained slightly smaller, more rigid cabinets, black paint and an 'M' suffix. Re-reviewed by the UK press, they were decried as harsh - with the exception of Practical Hi-Fi, whose reviewer used them with the then seriously unfashionable Quad II and gave them a big thumbs up. Funny, that.

In truth, the NS1000Ms are one of the most transparent 'speakers ever made, with dazzlingly fast transients, superb sound staging and great clarity and detail. But they also have a JBL-like capacity to inject life, drama and scale into everything they touch * a formidable combination of virtues!

Partner them with valves or Class A tranny power amps, turn the midrange trim pot down to *3dB (they do have a slight mid-forward balance, but this assuages it), site them on sturdy, low stands (Atacama BD200s are perfect) and you'll struggle to find a 'speaker that's as much fun.

Although Yamaha discontinued the NS1000M in the UK in 1995, in Japan it lives on as the NS1000X. With the M's fabled mid and treble units plus an improved carbon-fibre woofer, it's a fantastic loudspeaker. But top dog is the anniversary edition NS10000, big enough to make the '1000 look like a Wharfedale Diamond!"

http://www.locationsound.com/98summer/images/reveal.gif http://www.tannoy.com/images/revealx_m.jpg
Tannoy Professional has added three new models to its successful Reveal nearfield monitoring range, providing additional Reveal solutions for both stereo and 5.1 surround monitoring in music, broadcast, post-production, AV and mobile recording environments. Joining the successful Reveal and Reveal Active monitors are the Reveal X (shown here) and two active sub-bass speakers, the Reveal Sub 10 and the Sub 15 5.1. The Sub 15 5.1 incorporates all 6 amplifier channels for a complete 5.1 system.
________________________________________

Boxes of Sound
In most loudspeaker systems, the drivers and the crossover are housed in some sort of speaker enclosure. These enclosures serve a number of functions. On their most basic level, they make it much easier to set up the speakers. Everything's in one unit and the drivers are kept in the right position, so they work together to produce the best sound. Enclosures are usually built with heavy wood or another solid material that will effectively absorb the driver's vibration. If you simply placed a driver on a table, the table would vibrate so much it would drown out a lot of the speaker's sound. Additionally, the speaker enclosure affects how sound is produced. When we looked at speaker drivers, we focused on how the vibrating diaphragm emitted sound waves in front of the cone. But, since the diaphragm is moving back and forth, it's actually producing sound waves behind the cone as well. Different enclosure types have different ways of handling these "backward" waves.

The most common type of enclosure is the sealed enclosure, also called acoustic suspension enclosure. These enclosures are completely sealed, so no air can escape. This means the forward wave travels outward into the room, while the backward wave travels only into the box. Of course, since no air can escape, the internal air pressure is constantly changing -- when the driver moves in, the pressure is increased and when the driver moves out, it is decreased. Both movements create pressure differences between the air inside the box and the air outside the box. The air will always move to equalize pressure levels, so the driver is constantly being pushed toward its "resting" state -- the position at which internal and external air pressure are the same.
http://static.howstuffworks.com/gif/speaker-closed.gif
In a sealed speaker setup, the driver diaphragm compresses air in the enclosure when it moves in and rarefies air when it moves out.

These enclosures are less efficient than other designs because the amplifier has to boost the electrical signal to overcome the force of air pressure. The force serves a valuable function, however -- it acts like a spring to keep the driver in the right position. This makes for tighter, more precise sound production.

Other enclosure designs redirect the inward pressure outward, using it to supplement the forward sound wave. The most common way to do this is to build a small port into the speaker. In these bass reflex speakers, the backward motion of the diaphragm pushes sound waves out of the port, boosting the overall sound level. The main advantage of bass reflex enclosures is efficiency. The power moving the driver is used to emit two sound waves rather than one. The disadvantage is that there is no air pressure difference to spring the driver back into place, so the sound production is not as precise.

http://static.howstuffworks.com/gif/speaker-bass-reflex.gif
A bass reflex speaker produces two sound waves by moving one driver. When the driver compresses air forward, it rarefies it backward, and vice versa. The second sound wave is emitted from a port at the base of the speaker enclosure.

SOURCE http://howstuffworks.lycoszone.com/speaker4.htm

Martin Red
03-26-2003, 05:39 AM
http://shows.soundstagelive.com/shows/avtour2002/march23/simaudio_room.jpg
http://visual-reality.org/bigsound/images/bass.jpg
http://www.sweetwater.com/publications/sweetnotes/sn-summer95/images/JBL_Spkrs.jpeg JBL

http://www.nmc.vt.edu/Staff/James/macworld/Images/13.jpg JBL

Martin Red
03-26-2003, 05:45 AM
http://www.uncarved.demon.co.uk/dub/splash/graphics/cover.jpg

http://www.uncarved.demon.co.uk/dub/splash/graphics/crowd.jpg

http://www.uncarved.demon.co.uk/dub/splash/index.html

[ March 26, 2003, 08:57 AM: Message edited by: Martin Red ]

Martin Red
03-26-2003, 10:11 AM
Why Horns?

By Dr. Bruce Edgar
Edgarhorns

I remember hearing a very good horn loudspeaker for the first time in 1978. It was sheer magic to my ears. I could not believe the incredibly realistic sound that seemed to radiate effortlessly into the room. But when I talk to other audiophiles about horns, the reaction I hear is usually one of disgust. Like a bad hair day, everyone seems to have had a "bad horn" day.

Rich Weiner of "Bound for Sound" recently described his "bad horn" day. "As a neophyte audiophile, I once had the horrifying experience of listening to a friend's horn-based speaker system. "Killer equipment. You've never heard anything like it," he promised. Indeed I hadn't. I found myself sitting about six feet from a pair of Klipsch corner horns driven by Phase Linear 700 amps. My friend was right. I have never heard anything like it, although I understand that standing directly behind a 747 during takeoff is quite similar. Since that time I have avoided horn speakers." (Bound for Sound '99CES Report).

But times are improving. In the same report, Weiner says, "Perhaps it's time to try horns again...Edgar's Titan (Horn) system was quite impressive...detailed and articulate..." Weiner's experience is not unique. Other reviewers and audiophiles are coming around to the concept of an acceptable audiophile horn system.

So you may ask, "What is the difference between the vintage horn systems and the new generation of horn loudspeakers?" I have been researching that question for the last 20 odd years. In the process, I founded Edgarhorn whose main goal is the design and manufacture of audiophile quality horn loudspeakers. But I'm getting ahead of the story. After I had heard my first good horn speaker, I began trying to hear other horn speakers and other pseudo-horns. Most of the ones I listened to didn't come close to that first system that I'd heard.

Eventually, I was able to analyze that good horn system to discover what made it tick. It belonged to a Senior Engineer at the aerospace company where I worked. At the time, I was a research scientist specializing in radio wave propagation and signals analysis. The design came from a group of amateur horn builders on the east coast lead by Ben Drisko in the early 50's. This system used a Drisko folded corner bass horn design, similar to the Klipschorn, and a JBL 375 compression driver on a Western Electric midrange horn. The component that made this system so good was the JBL 375 driver. My engineer friend recently bought a set of my Tractrix horns for his 375 drivers. When we tested them, I was astounded by their ruler flat response from 400 Hz to 10 kHz.

In the early 80's, I set about tracking down all the horn articles and papers and analyzing all of the published and underground designs. I was very disappointed. There was no clear way of horn design. What was even more depressing was the periodic regurgitation of wrong headed ideas of horn design in articles from year to year that has infiltrated into some horn design software that is marketed today. So I embarked on course of experimentation with horn design and construction. I figured that with my background in wave propagation, spectrum analysis, and experimental physics, it should be easy enough to arrive at a satisfactory design. Was I ever wrong. After 20 years of horn building, I'm still finding new ways of designing and building horns. It's the Edison experience of having to go through all the different combinations and permutations of drivers and horns. And my customers keep coming in with different requirements that change my views and shift the proverbial paradigm.

So back to the question, "What made the vintage horn systems sound bad?" There are a variety of problems. I have run into most of the horn problems either in designing my own horns or duplicating somebody else's horn.

The first problem is electronics. Weiner talked about listening to some Klipschorns with high power solid state amps. The amps were one source of the bad sound. Horn systems typically have sensitivities of 100 to 108 dB SPL with one watt input. Even at the loudest sound that you would realistically audition any speaker system (95-100dB), the amplifier is only delivering a watt or so to the horn system at peaks. Most of the time the amp is idling at 100's of milliwatts; yes, I said milliwatts. At this level many high power solid state amps have real problems with crossover distortion. For this reason, I tell people who buy my horn systems to try different amps with them along with their existing amp. The low power requirement of horns means that single ended tube (SET) amps can easily fill a room with sound. However, not all single ended tube amps are created equal. Some SET designs have relatively high levels of distortion that can be easily heard on the horn system. And of course, the horn gets the blame for the distorted sound.

A second problem with horn loudspeakers is that they are easily prone to resonant peaks in their response. I have heard some horn tweeters that made me think that I was being drilled between the eyes. Many horn midranges have a honky megaphone sound that comes from resonant peaks. I have measured many old horn midranges with high resolution spectrum analyzers and have found them loaded with high Q spikes that give each horn speaker its own characteristic coloration.

Bass horns have their own resonance problems. Typically, a well-designed bass horn that can go down to 35 Hz will have a total volume of 20 cu.ft. or more. A company's marketing department will say that it can't sell a big speaker like it. Moreover, the marketers say, "Keep the 35 Hz flare but make it smaller." So the horn length is truncated to make it smaller. The net result is long folded slowly expanding tube that sounds more like a resonant tuba than a wide band bass horn. The response plot looks as a series of harmonically related resonant peaks.

Some resonant problems are caused by structural defects. At the point where the sound comes out of the mouth of the horn, the edge of the mouth can vibrate in a bell mode. If you have seen some old style trumpet PA speakers, they were actually shaped like a round bell. A bell will resonate at a frequency whose wavelength can be wrapped around the circumference of the bell end. No horn is immune to bell modes, but proper damping and tension bracing can eliminate the problems.

A third problem is the use of improper drivers on horns. Good horn drivers require heavy magnets and light weight diaphragms. Most regular speakers used in typical box speaker systems have lower weight magnets and heavy diaphragms. The use of regular speakers on horns will, for the most part, yield restricted bandwidths and irregular responses. Recently, Speaker Builder featured an article touting an easy horn for your dome tweeter. I performed the experiment with a high quality dome tweeter on a 800 Hz Tractrix horn. Without horn loading, the dome tweeter went up to 20 kHz at a sensitivity of 88 dB. With the horn, the efficiency increased several dB, but the response rolled off above 10 kHz. With such a horn loaded tweeter, any listener would ask, "Where's the top end?" My survey of horn construction project articles has yielded many other examples of using the wrong driver on a horn.

As a corollary to the wrong driver syndrome, an associated problem is the use of PA horn systems in home stereo applications. For example, I find many horn enthusiasts over the world using variants of the Altec "Voice of the Theater" (VOT) speaker system. The VOT featured a compression driver on a metal mid horn and a 15" woofer on a front loaded 110 Hz midbass horn. The back of the woofer was loaded by a bass reflex ported enclosure. In general, I have found the Altec compression drivers and woofers to be good quality horn drivers, but the horn design can be improved with my Tractrix horns. And I have done this for numerous customers.

After discussing all the various ills of vintage horn designs, the reader may ask' "Can a good audiophile horn system be designed and manufactured?" The answer is yes, and in my next installment of "Why Horns?", I will discuss the critical aspects of horn design that would lead to a truly worthy horn system. Please email me at bedgar@socal.rr.com with your horn questions. I will endeavor to answer them all and work them into future installments.

http://www.enjoythemusic.com/magazine/manufacture/whyhorns.htm

Martin Red
03-26-2003, 10:41 AM
http://www.dynaudioacoustics.com/Files/Graphics/Product_gfx/AIR-new_15jan02/m3xx.jpg

http://www.chicagoreggae.com/images/showpics/skyjuice/loudspeakers.jpg

prussell
03-26-2003, 10:48 AM
my dream horns:

http://www.avantgarde-usa.com

:eek:

Martin Red
03-26-2003, 10:51 AM
Originally posted by prussell:
my dream horns:

http://www.avantgarde-usa.com

:eek: WAAAAAAAAHHHHEEY !
graemlins/thumbsup.gif un bloody believeable

http://www.avantgarde-usa.com/pix/index/avantgarde%20copy.jpg

prussell
03-26-2003, 10:55 AM
A bit more info:

http://www.avantgarde-usa.com/home.html

Check under 'Technical', and '31 Secrets'.
These guys really know their stuff, and have many interesting philosophies on "traditional" Hi-Fi.
You can also request a free information packet.

.pr

The Real Dragonfly Jones
03-26-2003, 11:09 AM
Originally posted by Martin Red:

http://www.chicagoreggae.com/images/showpics/skyjuice/loudspeakers.jpg If you gotta put your finger(s) over your ear like that... than that's not a good.

I stood in front of one of the speaker arrays @ Crobar in Miami for 45 minutes and could hold a convo with someone standing next to me. But the shit was still bangin....

.... not too many system I can say that about!!

mdpm99
03-26-2003, 12:32 PM
one watt - one db

Great Thread....thanks for posting.

d

Tenyu
03-26-2003, 01:07 PM
Originally posted by Martin Red:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by prussell:
my dream horns:

http://www.avantgarde-usa.com

:eek: WAAAAAAAAHHHHEEY !
graemlins/thumbsup.gif un bloody believeable

http://www.avantgarde-usa.com/pix/index/avantgarde%20copy.jpg </font>[/QUOTE]i've heard these speakers at an audiophile center several times and they are phucking ridiculous! i think their cheapest speakers are $10,000.