http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090604/..._wh/obama_text
I've mentioned this treaty on several occasions...but the treaty was actually signed in 1786...this is also the treaty that "negro slaves" are part and partial to...we are named in this treaty(under the free national name "Moor") and it would have freed us from slavery but most slaves had no knowledge of its existence(one reason it was forbidden for us to read or write)...also know that Islam has always been a part of America's story. The first nation to recognize my country was Morocco. In signing the Treaty of Tripoli in 1796
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/bar1786t.asp
this part of the treaty is tied to the release of an African prince, Abdulrahman Ibrahim Ibn Sori, who was enslaved and eventually shipped to Mississipppi....In case of a War between the Parties, the Prisoners are not to be made Slaves, but to be exchanged one for another, Captain for Captain, Officer for Officer and one private Man for another; and if there shall prove a deficiency on either side, it shall be made up by the payment of one hundred Mexican Dollars for each Person wanting; And it is agreed that all Prisoners shall be exchanged in twelve Months from the Time of their being taken, and that this exchange may be effected by a Merchant or any other Person authorized by either of the Parties.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdulra...rahim_Ibn_Sori
the above quote is some tricky wordplay by Obama...we were born with full and equal rights...but we believe we are something we aren't...NEGROS...Palestinians must abandon violence. Resistance through violence and killing is wrong and it does not succeed. For centuries, black people in America suffered the lash of the whip as slaves and the humiliation of segregation. But it was not violence that won full and equal rights. It was a peaceful and determined insistence upon the ideals at the center of America's founding.
see: Abdulrahman Ibrahim Ibn Sori...Abdul rahman was not a "subject(ie. negro slave) to these "dominions"(ie. United States)...so under the treaty he was "immediately released"...read the book: PRINCE AMONG SLAVES by Terry AlfordIf any Moor shall bring Citizens of the United States or their Effects to His Majesty, the Citizens shall immediately be set at Liberty and the Effects restored, and in like Manner, if any Moor not a Subject of these Dominions shall make Prize of any of the Citizens of America or their Effects and bring them into any of the Ports of His Majesty, they shall be immediately released, as they will then be considered as under His Majesty's Protection.
I'm sure Obama is in full knowledge that "negroes"(ie. black people in America) have and never will be afforded "full and equal rights" under this name...(ie. Jena 6, Sean Bell, lynchings, etc.)If a Citizen of the United States should kill or wound a Moor, or on the contrary if a Moor shall kill or wound a Citizen of the United States, the Law of the Country shall take place and equal Justice shall be rendered, the Consul assisting at the Tryal, and if any Delinquent shall make his escape, the Consul shall not be answerable for him in any manner whatever
Obama fails to mention that violence was used by the colonists to give themselves "full and equal rights" which culminated in the Revolutionary War...yet again, niggaz are relegated to being passive participants to history and it is maintained that our so-called "freedom" came through peaceful means...for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction...
We became slaves due to violence and Obama wants us to believe that freedom can happen without an equal and opposite reaction...this is a false notion... plain and simple



Reply With Quote










Bookmarks