Sorry for long delay...mhd, I'd like to cop to selfish...in an odd sort of way...I have too many friends on the police force here who would have had to cope with this and I pay taxes here but didn't hear a peep about who was going to foot the enormous security bill for this.
Meanwhile:
let's see why Brazen agrees with the folks in Englewood:
1. The estate is across the street from a grade 6-12 school.
2. The guards on the estate will purportedly be carrying AK-47s - but whatever they are carrying, it's too close to a school.
3. The estate is on a major commuter thoroughfare and it is very difficult to map alternative routes since they are already congested too. The street in question has a bottleneck right at the corner by this estate.
4. The town would incur an incredible cost in terms of securing the area for/from protesters and the big Q himself.
5. The estate is next door to a family with children...in close proximity.
6. It's not an area that can easily be secured.
7. The other contiguous property is a yeshiva...with children all over the place.
...and, in my mind, that is all before even beginning to kvetch about Libya's politics or our own shenanigans regarding Libya.
It looks like the stay in Englewood will not happen.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/29/ny...qaddafi&st=cse
...and so, I am relieved...
Bookmarks