You are jumping from a Senator's testimony for research upon " weather modification" to:
- The Red Cross convention of 1976 about disarmament and warfare "techniques".
But, your point is already lost cause:
A - You hang on as if "Weather cannot process in the ground" is a wrong assertion,
B - You quote the ICRC text about "litoshpere", when weather processes in the "atmosphere.
But you continue and tell us what is "litosphere".
While complaining about a Chavez who told:
A - Without any proof,
B - With this information being contradicted by Prince Hifi in post 3
that the US have been forming a Quake thanks to some war technology which:
A - Has never been witenessed by anyone,
B - Has nothing to do with weather modification (should be seismic).
And you jump on the idea that such "unknown technology" exists cause China can change the weather:
A - Which processes in the atmosphere,
B - and China is not some US state.
So, with all these proofs and facts of your distorted and out-of-focus logic, you want the international body to react to Chavez and act upon the USA which:
A - Never signified therefore never ratified the Convention you choose as an example,(so why would they give a flying fuck about it?)
B - Has better topics to offer to his diplomats, like working on the Haitian disaster.
I hope I didn't Powelled that shit too much, but that's how you always do.
So get your proofs from solid grounds, please.