I found this picture of a white man, but unfortunatly, the shot has been taken when he was walking naked in front of a white wall...
Idance
And here's a pic of a group of nonwhites, they are waiting for the bus.
Idance
rhodey & 206REFUGEE
you have a child ( maybe yes maybe no ) and they grow up and *god forbid* they fall truly and deeply in love with a *white* man / woman.
they want to get married and stuff.
you have to meet his / her parents.
what happens??
you bring big mate to elbow your way into there house?
whilst rodders backs you up with inane drivel?
or......?
pray do tell.
I would express to her(or him) that I do not think it's a good Idea for nonwhites to engage in sexual active with whites while we are under a system o racism white supremacy.
I meet them, if the parents are white and able to practice racism white supremacy, they will be considered racist suspects.you have to meet his / her parents.
what happens??
I do not under stand what you are saying here.you bring big mate to elbow your way into there house?
whilst rodders backs you up with inane drivel?
or......?
pray do tell.
You know Rhodey, you're the racist here, who wants to see racism elsewhere :
From the works of the famous Pierre-Andre Taguieff :
On racism
In La Force du préjugé - essai sur le racisme et ses doubles (1987), Pierre-André Taguieff analyzed several different types of racism:
* The first type of racism is against miscegenation, in favor of racial segregation, and wants to preserve differences between various alleged races. ((Who's white, who's bad?))19th century racialism theories, such as Arthur de Gobineau's An Essay on the Inequality of the Human Races (1853-55), are an example of this type of racism, which pretends to be founded on science and on the existence of biological human races. In other words, this pseudo-scientific racism mistakes differences in the amount of melanin (which determines skin color) for racial differences.
* The second type is insidiously hosted by the Enlightenment philosophy of universalism: its dream of unity of mankind may bring it, in specific and extreme cases, to the will to annihilate all cultural differences, amounting to effective genocide or ethnocides. Taguieff's point is not in declaring that the Enlightenment philosophy is racist in itself, but rather that extreme forms of this will of universality may lead, in practice, to the destruction of the plurality of cultures ((nonwhites as a whole, whites as a whole?)) and to the rejection of even moderate forms of multiculturalism.
Taguieff is also known for his work over conspiracy thoeries, for which he found 4 major beliefs :
1- Nothing is accidental,
2 - Everything that occurs is the result of hidden intentions or desires,
3 - Nothing is as it seems to be,
4 - Everything is related, albeit hidden.
Keep' on learning Rhodey. Stop living on so much bias.
Idance
Damn' this was written 23 years ago! It's 2010 and you still refuse to learn.
Idance
Look, nobody is denying that racism and white supremacy exist.
They do.
But you have taken the situation and blown it WAY out of proportion. Your beliefs are at odds with the core fundamental philosophies of Dr. Martin Luther King. If you're really interested in defeating racism/white supremacy/hate, then I would suggest that you follow his example.
Then stop using crazy glue to put the blindfold of racism black supremacy over your face!
Interesting...and valid.
Or Malcolm X's example...oh wait...they were both killed for their beliefs. Ready to make that ultimate sacrifice Rhodey? I doubt it. You prefer jaw-jackin' and finger dancin' online.
I am disgusted to see your response to the possibility of inter-racial relationships...but maybe that's because there are so many in my family. If the argument is that people are people and color shouldn't matter and that justice should come from that, then you have to let it go too, son. You too.
The nature of smoke and mirrors is to keep you from seeing what the magician is doing. Race and gender arguments and oppression are smoke and mirrors. The bottom line is, was and always will be economic. Class matters...wait...rephrase: socioeconomic status matters. With that go a million performative demands...
Still waiting for your definition of "class" as you understand it. 47 pages? really? seriously?
www.myspace.com/templedynasty
www.myspace.com/brazenmuse
www.myspace.com/feliciatemple
www.myspace.com/robdanoizetemple
http://www.youtube.com/feliciatemple
Louie "Lou" Gorbea:
http://www.podomatic.com/profile/lgorbea and http://lougorbea.com/
Mark Mendoza (280 West): markmendozamixes.blogspot.com
"I'd rather have the kind of clear conscience that comes from doing what's right than the kind that comes from ignoring what's wrong." Me...8/13/07
I believe racism IS white supremacy
I guess that's is how you feel. Maybe we should ask the multitudes of nonwhite living on this planet, the majority l subject to extreme poverty , violence, depredation , disease and Death. I suspect they would feel differently.But you have taken the situation and blown it WAY out of proportion.
We may not have gone about things in the same way but I do suspect King wanted to bring about a system of justice.Your beliefs are at odds with the core fundamental philosophies of Dr. Martin Luther King. If you're really interested in defeating racism/white supremacy/hate, then I would suggest that you follow his example.
Naysayer, Wwhat happened to King in the end? Was he sucessful in ending racism white supremacy?
I do believe King was assassinated (Impossible to prove under the S.R.W.S) and non whites were subsequently pacified into eventual acceptance with a token holiday.
I would suggest nonwhites dont follow other people in when attempting to produce justice. I would suggest following the logic - counter racist logic.
I suspect You are just as qualified as anyone else in replacing the SYSTEM of racism white supremacy with a SYSTEM of justice. But you have to know what you are dealing with first.
Bookmarks