Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: If you think the Moon landing of 69 was a fake, you'll probably burn...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    8,594

    If you think the Moon landing of 69 was a fake, you'll probably burn...

    On earth!

    A study of Psychological Science magazine has brought interesting results: even if nearly all climate experts worldwide agree that human COČ emissions are altering the
    world's climate, segments of the public remain unconvinced by the scienti c evidence.

    Thanks to the existence of Blogs and websites denying or questioning climate science, the experts are seen as part of a conspiracy!

    The study goes on, showing how conspiracy theorists play a huge role in science rejection.

    You can read it here, and it is very interesting:

    http://websites.psychology.uwa.edu.a...Conspiracy.pdf

    Idance

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Port Richey, FL
    Posts
    881
    Some people will refuse to believe anything. Hyper-emotionalism like that makes me want to punch people sometimes.
    Oh, I know very well how I got my name

    __________________________________

    My show with music in it- http://phthalyl.podomatic.com/ :)

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    dc
    Posts
    38,073
    Quote Originally Posted by neon View Post
    Hyper-emotionalism like that makes me want to punch people sometimes.
    priceless

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York, United States
    Posts
    21,586

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    8,594
    Quote Originally Posted by DJ Timmy Richardson View Post
    Boy those rockets had the ultimate radiation protection . http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt
    Well, excerpt from the same article:

    The Apollo missions marked the first event where humans traveled through the Van Allen belts, which was one of several radiation hazards known by mission planners. The astronauts had low exposure in the Van Allen belts due to the short period of time spent flying through them in the heavily-shielded Command Module. In fact, the astronauts' overall exposure was dominated by solar particles once outside the earth's magnetic field. The total radiation received by the astronauts varied from mission to mission but was measured to be between 0.16 and 1.14 rads, much less than the standard of five (5) rem per year set by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission for people who work with radioactivity

    And you don't die from these levels of radiations in a year, whatsoever.

    Not trying to go against you at all Timmy, I've been working in nuclear power plants for some years and have been more afflicted than the Apollo missionaries. That's some of why I know.
    Same thing goes with equipments who were brought into radioactive zones, they can be decontaminated in less than a month (let's say a camera for example would be treated and available again to its owner in a week).

    Idance

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York, United States
    Posts
    21,586
    Quote Originally Posted by the crackhouse View Post
    Well, excerpt from the same article:

    The Apollo missions marked the first event where humans traveled through the Van Allen belts, which was one of several radiation hazards known by mission planners. The astronauts had low exposure in the Van Allen belts due to the short period of time spent flying through them in the heavily-shielded Command Module. In fact, the astronauts' overall exposure was dominated by solar particles once outside the earth's magnetic field. The total radiation received by the astronauts varied from mission to mission but was measured to be between 0.16 and 1.14 rads, much less than the standard of five (5) rem per year set by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission for people who work with radioactivity

    And you don't die from these levels of radiations in a year, whatsoever.

    Not trying to go against you at all Timmy, I've been working in nuclear power plants for some years and have been more afflicted than the Apollo missionaries. That's some of why I know.
    Same thing goes with equipments who were brought into radioactive zones, they can be decontaminated in less than a month (let's say a camera for example would be treated and available again to its owner in a week).

    Idance
    I have taken radiation physics amongst other radiation classes so I'm well aware of the effects of radiation.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    8,594
    Quote Originally Posted by DJ Timmy Richardson View Post
    I have taken radiation physics amongst other radiation classes so I'm well aware of the effects of radiation.
    So what is your post about, I don't get it?

    They did let men fly under radiations or they never did it cause NASA has too much respect for humans?

    Idance

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York, United States
    Posts
    21,586
    Quote Originally Posted by the crackhouse View Post
    So what is your post about, I don't get it?

    They did let men fly under radiations or they never did it cause NASA has too much respect for humans?

    Idance
    I'm just raising eyebrows. We see the effects of the sun laying out on a beach all day. 200,000 miles closer to it make me wonder what those effects are.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    15,404

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    8,594
    Quote Originally Posted by DJ Timmy Richardson View Post
    I'm just raising eyebrows. We see the effects of the sun laying out on a beach all day. 200,000 miles closer to it make me wonder what those effects are.
    I don't think it would change that much the effects, it's like measuring the temperature of a place at point zero placed at 100 miles of a heat source and the temperature changes at a point "P" placed at 99.8 miless from the same source.

    I'm not sure about comparing the effects of heat to those of sun radiations, but I doubt that would make such a difference?

    Idance

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    15,469
    Quote Originally Posted by the crackhouse View Post

    I've been working in nuclear power plants for some years and have been more afflicted than the Apollo missionaries. That's some of why I know.

    Idance
    Well that explains a lot......

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    birmingham, the heart of england
    Posts
    38,430
    We measure the distance between the earth and the moon by bouncing a laser of mirrors on the moon.


    So if the moon landings were another conspiracy, Who put the mirrors on the moon ?, the friggin' Clangers.


  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York, United States
    Posts
    21,586
    Quote Originally Posted by the crackhouse View Post
    I don't think it would change that much the effects, it's like measuring the temperature of a place at point zero placed at 100 miles of a heat source and the temperature changes at a point "P" placed at 99.8 miless from the same source.

    I'm not sure about comparing the effects of heat to those of sun radiations, but I doubt that would make such a difference?

    Idance
    And yet: http://abcnews.go.com/Health/Healthd...1#.UByAy2Ge72I

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    8,594
    Quote Originally Posted by DJ Timmy Richardson View Post
    Again Timmy, I'm not trying to talk shit but you are comparing distance and duration. The exposure to radiations at a certain distance has nothing to do with the time exposed to the radiation.

    Experienced airlines pilots can be exposed to lower radiations but for about 250 hours per trimester when the Apollo mission has been exposed to higher (yet different) radiations for 200 hours in a row.

    So, of course airline pilots have a better protection throught the atmospheric "shield", but they will take more radiations in the long term.

    Idance

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Reigel 7
    Posts
    9,586
    Quote Originally Posted by Martin Red View Post
    We measure the distance between the earth and the moon by bouncing a laser of mirrors on the moon.


    So if the moon landings were another conspiracy, Who put the mirrors on the moon ?, the friggin' Clangers.

    Timmy?
    "We're not just dancing to have fun-we're dancing for survival. We're dancing to save our lives." PTT

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •