Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Anyone using hardware sequencers/samplers? help me out please

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    holland
    Posts
    1,276

    Post

    All though i see a lot of poeple using more and more software for music production, hardware sequencing is still an option.
    Im thinking about moving on to a RS7000 or a MPC, because the pc is driving me nuts.

    Has any of you got good experiences with some of the contemporary stuff like MV8000 MC909 RS7000 MPC etc???

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,434

    Post

    yes, love the RS7000 and it's little brother the Rm1x, but you already know that ;)

    forummember Kaseem also uses an RS7000 if i'm not mistaken?

    Olaf
    they used to laugh at me
    but i saw the future

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    holland
    Posts
    1,276

    Post

    Originally posted by O'love:
    yes, love the RS7000 and it's little brother the Rm1x, but you already know that ;)

    forummember Kaseem also uses an RS7000 if i'm not mistaken?

    Olaf
    Yeah ive checked the RS7000 its got nice features, only the nongraphical display is disencouraging.
    Sounds great though, and the patternsequencing thing is nice, especialy for technoish stuff

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,434

    Post

    you're really losing me! ;)

    you want a hardware sequencer, and then you also want a graphical display? you sure you don't want a PC? ;)

    Olaf, just kidding, a littlebit ;)
    they used to laugh at me
    but i saw the future

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    831

    Post

    I work with an mpc1000. It has pretty much the same sequencer as the mpc2000/xl (which I've also worked on) minus some capacity (100k/300k notes). Tight, reliable and easy to use. Plus, it gives you a lot of options.

    If you go with an mpc, I'd recommend either the 2000xl or 1000 (it's the features besides the sequencer that you'd have to go over for yourself).

    Hope this helps,
    peace

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    holland
    Posts
    1,276

    Post

    Originally posted by O'love:
    you're really losing me! ;)

    you want a hardware sequencer, and then you also want a graphical display? you sure you don't want a PC? ;)

    Olaf, just kidding, a littlebit ;)
    Well its complicated, i got a lot of reasons to use hardware sequencing/sampling in stead of software
    1 RSI
    2 My pc is to slow and i got problems with drivers wich i havent been able to sort out. To solve this i must buy a new pc wich gonna cost me 900euro's at least. (via via chipset bullshit and some other stuff)
    3 Hardware is more skillbased,,, skillbased mastery of an instrument is more expression,,,, more expression is better music period
    4 Hardware is more fun.


    MPC1000 is nice, im still thinking about that one

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2

    Post

    I find the the best thing and easiest I have dones is to use Cubase on a PC or MC to sequence an all hardware studio.... its very very easy and if you have a PC just for music it should run perfect

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    tel aviv, Israel
    Posts
    3,629

    Post

    sorry for interupting, but r u Danny-Balihu?
    <a href=\"http://e.walla.co.il/?w=//785770\" target=\"_blank\">mix1</a> <a href=\"http://e.walla.co.il/?w=//630022\" target=\"_blank\">mix2</a> <a href=\"http://www.djhistory.com/mixes/\" target=\"_blank\">mix3</a> <br /><b>OUT NOW-Language Of An Open Heart E.P./Delsin</b> <br /> <a href=\"http://www.myspace.com/djyoavb\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.myspace.com/djyoavb</a>

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •