Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: C64,Trackers, Amiga computer and history.....Straight from users mouth!

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Miami grew up in Spanish Harlem, NYC
    Posts
    6,977

    Post

    I am very interested in learning about Trackers and I feel the best information comes from the actual users of the product themselves.

    If any DHP member has had experience with any Tracker program, knows about the history of Tracker programs or has a lead on how to fimiliarize myself with the background of Trackers please do not hesitate to assist me on learning what this program designed to compose music- from day one- was and is all about. :D
    Just do not hate for the sense of hating be very constructive with anything you disagree with because you may have missed an important ingredient that helped cook your hate. My ingredients are: Peace, Love and Happibeats..... :-)
    Jorge G pres."The Curious Jorge Show"
    http://cyberjamz.com

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    On the dancefloor...
    Posts
    470

    Post

    Hi There,

    Wow! And me who thought I was the only one who was familiar with the old "Tracker" programs. I bought my first Amiga computer around the same time I really started getting into the house thing, it was around 1989.

    At the time there was a really cool "Tracker" progam called SoundTracker it was a freeware so you didn't have to pay for it and I must admit it completely blew me away. It only had 4 audio channels and was using 44Khz 8 bits - samples. But basically, it worked pretty much like an Akai MPC. The later versions had a built-in sample editor so if you had the appropriate Audio interface you could just connect any audio sources to your Amiga computer and sample away, edit your samples and then program your own tracks. You had lots of control over the samples and it was dead easy to get going! I think the first version were quite limited and you could only use something like 16 or 32 samples. It was pretty amazing actually given that the Amiga 500 computer I owned had 512Ko Memory but still the results were pretty dawn good.

    The actual software, evolved rapidily and it started supporting MIDI, the number of channels was extended to 8. The interface was extremely user-friendly and it was very easy for someone who really wasn't familiar with music software at all to do things very quickly. As the time went, "SoundTracker" became "Protracker" I think and I believe the last version was released in 1994.

    You could probably compare those programs to things like Fruity Loops and maybe Reason today.

    I still have that Amiga computer somewhere at home and in fact, our first track that went to be pressed onto plastic was made using an Amiga computer as the sequencer. Scary Hey??? [img]smile.gif[/img]

    Guillaume*

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,434

    Post

    i started out with tracker software on the C64 using a self-build 8bit sampler cartridge...we mainly made beats/loops to mix with accapella's.... mad fun ;)

    Olaf
    they used to laugh at me
    but i saw the future

  4. #4
    <DLoop> Guest

    Post

    Originally posted by Guillaume:
    Hi There,

    Wow! And me who thought I was the only one who was familiar with the old "Tracker" programs. I bought my first Amiga computer around the same time I really started getting into the house thing, it was around 1989.

    At the time there was a really cool "Tracker" progam called SoundTracker it was a freeware so you didn't have to pay for it and I must admit it completely blew me away. It only had 4 audio channels and was using 44Khz 8 bits - samples. But basically, it worked pretty much like an Akai MPC. The later versions had a built-in sample editor so if you had the appropriate Audio interface you could just connect any audio sources to your Amiga computer and sample away, edit your samples and then program your own tracks. You had lots of control over the samples and it was dead easy to get going! I think the first version were quite limited and you could only use something like 16 or 32 samples. It was pretty amazing actually given that the Amiga 500 computer I owned had 512Ko Memory but still the results were pretty dawn good.

    The actual software, evolved rapidily and it started supporting MIDI, the number of channels was extended to 8. The interface was extremely user-friendly and it was very easy for someone who really wasn't familiar with music software at all to do things very quickly. As the time went, "SoundTracker" became "Protracker" I think and I believe the last version was released in 1994.

    You could probably compare those programs to things like Fruity Loops and maybe Reason today.

    I still have that Amiga computer somewhere at home and in fact, our first track that went to be pressed onto plastic was made using an Amiga computer as the sequencer. Scary Hey??? [img]smile.gif[/img]

    Guillaume*
    The old Urban Shakedown "Some Justice" track was done on Soundtracker on an Amiga.

    Used to use them myself to do music for computer demo's. Great fun!!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Posts
    9

    Post

    I used to use Fast Tracker II for MS-Dos. Pretty much all you need to write decent beats.
    And it's still evolving:

    www.renoise.com (for Windows and soon OSX)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Miami grew up in Spanish Harlem, NYC
    Posts
    6,977

    Post

    Originally posted by kniffter:
    I used to use Fast Tracker II for MS-Dos. Pretty much all you need to write decent beats.
    And it's still evolving:

    www.renoise.com (for Windows and soon OSX)
    Hello Kniffter, Renoise is exactly why I created this topic. [img]graemlins/thumbsup.gif[/img]
    Just do not hate for the sense of hating be very constructive with anything you disagree with because you may have missed an important ingredient that helped cook your hate. My ingredients are: Peace, Love and Happibeats..... :-)
    Jorge G pres."The Curious Jorge Show"
    http://cyberjamz.com

  7. #7
    <liquid boy> Guest

    Post

    nice, renoise. other trackers on the same kind of level are buzz (freeware) and psycle (open source) they're fairly similar in layout, except that psycle uses a traditional tracker sequencer. i think (people say anyway) that psycle sounds alot beter than buzz. but buzz has wwaaayyy more generators/effects.
    you can use vst's in psycle (and buzz).

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Miami grew up in Spanish Harlem, NYC
    Posts
    6,977

    Post

    Originally posted by <liquid boy>:
    nice, renoise. other trackers on the same kind of level are buzz (freeware) and psycle (open source) they're fairly similar in layout, except that psycle uses a traditional tracker sequencer. i think (people say anyway) that psycle sounds alot beter than buzz. but buzz has wwaaayyy more generators/effects.
    you can use vst's in psycle (and buzz).
    [img]graemlins/thumbsup.gif[/img] Thanks Liquid Boy for the info on Buzz and Psycle... [img]graemlins/respekt.gif[/img]
    Just do not hate for the sense of hating be very constructive with anything you disagree with because you may have missed an important ingredient that helped cook your hate. My ingredients are: Peace, Love and Happibeats..... :-)
    Jorge G pres."The Curious Jorge Show"
    http://cyberjamz.com

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •